Hello,
This patch was sent in May, now everything is in place to commit the
OpenRISC gdb port upstream except for the OK from GCC on this patch.
Are there any concerns? Who will commit this to GCC?
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Stafford Horne <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> * ChangeLog:
>
> 2017-02-12 Stafford Horne <sho...@gmail.com>
>
> * configure.ac: Remove logic adding gdb to noconfigsdirs for or1k.
> * configure: Regenerate.
>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> ---
> configure | 7 -------
> configure.ac | 7 -------
> 2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> index be9dd89..0bf47fa 100755
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -3632,10 +3632,6 @@ case "${target}" in
> ;;
> *-*-rtems*)
> noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-libgloss"
> - # this is not caught below because this stanza matches earlier
> - case $target in
> - or1k*-*-*) noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gdb" ;;
> - esac
> ;;
> # The tpf target doesn't support gdb yet.
> *-*-tpf*)
> @@ -3841,9 +3837,6 @@ case "${target}" in
> nvptx*-*-*)
> noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-libssp target-libstdc++-v3
> target-libobjc"
> ;;
> - or1k*-*-*)
> - noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gdb"
> - ;;
> sh-*-*)
> case "${target}" in
> sh*-*-elf)
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 532c5c2..9d16792 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -966,10 +966,6 @@ case "${target}" in
> ;;
> *-*-rtems*)
> noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-libgloss"
> - # this is not caught below because this stanza matches earlier
> - case $target in
> - or1k*-*-*) noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gdb" ;;
> - esac
> ;;
> # The tpf target doesn't support gdb yet.
> *-*-tpf*)
> @@ -1175,9 +1171,6 @@ case "${target}" in
> nvptx*-*-*)
> noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-libssp target-libstdc++-v3
> target-libobjc"
> ;;
> - or1k*-*-*)
> - noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gdb"
> - ;;
> sh-*-*)
> case "${target}" in
> sh*-*-elf)
> --
> 2.9.4
>
