Hi. Following patch adds new sanitization checks for profile_quality. Problem is that zero initialization of a struct with profile_count will lead to an invalid counter. This can help to catch them.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests. Ready to be installed? Martin
>From edec114cf1dd29bb571855a80e1b45ae040da200 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: marxin <mli...@suse.cz> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:46:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add new verification for profile-count.h. gcc/ChangeLog: 2018-01-12 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz> * profile-count.h (enum profile_quality): Use 0 as invalid enum value of profile_quality. --- gcc/profile-count.h | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/profile-count.h b/gcc/profile-count.h index 3c5f720ee81..7a43917ebbc 100644 --- a/gcc/profile-count.h +++ b/gcc/profile-count.h @@ -30,27 +30,27 @@ enum profile_quality { or may not match reality. It is local to function and can not be compared inter-procedurally. Never used by probabilities (they are always local). */ - profile_guessed_local = 0, + profile_guessed_local = 1, /* Profile was read by feedback and was 0, we used local heuristics to guess better. This is the case of functions not run in profile fedback. Never used by probabilities. */ - profile_guessed_global0 = 1, + profile_guessed_global0 = 2, /* Same as profile_guessed_global0 but global count is adjusted 0. */ - profile_guessed_global0adjusted = 2, + profile_guessed_global0adjusted = 3, /* Profile is based on static branch prediction heuristics. It may or may not reflect the reality but it can be compared interprocedurally (for example, we inlined function w/o profile feedback into function with feedback and propagated from that). Never used by probablities. */ - profile_guessed = 3, + profile_guessed = 4, /* Profile was determined by autofdo. */ - profile_afdo = 4, + profile_afdo = 5, /* Profile was originally based on feedback but it was adjusted by code duplicating optimization. It may not precisely reflect the particular code path. */ - profile_adjusted = 5, + profile_adjusted = 6, /* Profile was read from profile feedback or determined by accurate static method. */ profile_precise = 7 @@ -505,6 +505,8 @@ public: /* Return false if profile_probability is bogus. */ bool verify () const { + gcc_checking_assert (profile_guessed_local <= m_quality + && m_quality <= profile_precise); if (m_val == uninitialized_probability) return m_quality == profile_guessed; else if (m_quality < profile_guessed) @@ -784,6 +786,8 @@ public: /* Return false if profile_count is bogus. */ bool verify () const { + gcc_checking_assert (profile_guessed_local <= m_quality + && m_quality <= profile_precise); return m_val != uninitialized_count || m_quality == profile_guessed_local; } -- 2.14.3