On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 6:50 AM, Jan Hubicka <hubi...@ucw.cz> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:01 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:28 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Uros, >> >> >> >> Can you take a look at my x86 backend changes so that they are ready >> >> to check in once we have consensus. >> > >> > Please finish the talks about the correct approach first. Once the >> > consensus is reached, please post the final version of the patches for >> > review. >> >> A new set of patches are posted at >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01041.html >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01044.html >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01045.html >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01043.html >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01042.html >> >> I will submit an additional patch to disallow >> -mindirect-branch=/-mfunction-return= >> with -mshstk. >> >> > BTW: I have no detailed insight in these issues, so I'll look mostly >> > at the implementation details, probably early next week. >> > >> >> Kernel teams are waiting for the GCC 8 upstream patches. They >> have been using my GCC 7 backports for weeks now. Jan, can >> you review my patches before Uros has time next week? > > I have already read the original series, so I can take a look at the
Thanks. > updated ones. Did we get some concensus on how much we want to do > in middle-end? I believe so. Most of people, including Jeff, now think that my x86 specific approach is the way to go. -- H.J.