The following obvious patch fixes a NULL pointer dereference:

Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/decl.c  (revision 256671)
+++ gcc/fortran/decl.c  (working copy)
@@ -1718,7 +1718,7 @@
                    }
                  else if (init->expr_type == EXPR_ARRAY)
                    {
-                     if (init->ts.u.cl)
+                     if (init->ts.u.cl && init->ts.u.cl->length)
                        {
                          const gfc_expr *length = init->ts.u.cl->length;
                          if (length->expr_type != EXPR_CONSTANT)


Regtests without new failures on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
Testcase derived PR see below.

Whoever wants to take it, please commit to 8-trunk.
Due to the nature of the patch, it should be safe to backport
to the 6 and 7 branches.

Thanks,
Harald

---

Changelog:

2018-01-17  Harald Anlauf  <anl...@gmx.de>

        PR fortran/83874
        * decl.c (add_init_expr_to_sym): Do not dereference NULL pointer.



Testsuite:

2018-01-17  Harald Anlauf  <anl...@gmx.de>

        PR fortran/83874
        * gfortran.dg/pr83874.f90: New test.


Index: gfortran.dg/pr83874.f90
===================================================================
--- gfortran.dg/pr83874.f90     (revision 0)
+++ gfortran.dg/pr83874.f90     (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+! PR fortran/83874
+! There was an ICE while initializing the character arrays
+!
+! Contributed by Harald Anlauf <anl...@gmx.de>
+!
+program charinit
+  implicit none
+  type t
+     character(len=1) :: name
+  end type t
+  type(t), parameter :: z(2)= [ t ('a'), t ('b') ]
+  character(len=1), parameter :: names1(*) = z% name
+  character(len=*), parameter :: names2(2) = z% name
+  character(len=*), parameter :: names3(*) = z% name
+  if (.not. (names1(1) == "a" .and. names1(2) == "b")) call abort ()
+  if (.not. (names2(1) == "a" .and. names2(2) == "b")) call abort ()
+  if (.not. (names3(1) == "a" .and. names3(2) == "b")) call abort ()
+end program charinit

Reply via email to