I use x86_64-apple-darwin17 and I run the test with -m32. Without the patch, a plain compilation leads to four errors and a timing
0.011u 0.008s 0:00.02 50.0% 0+0k 0+0io 13pf+0w With the patch I get the four errors plus "Result of LEN overflows its kind » and a timing much slower 12.454u 21.185s 0:35.29 95.2% 0+0k 0+0io 955pf+0w Dominique > Le 21 janv. 2018 à 12:11, Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist.ja...@gmail.com> a écrit > : > > PING > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Janne Blomqvist > <blomqvist.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Janne Blomqvist >> <blomqvist.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Dominique d'Humières >>> <domi...@tournesol.lps.ens.fr> wrote: >>>> I have finally bootstrapped gfortran with the two patches applied and the >>>> spurious warnings with -Wall are now gone (limited testing), but I see a >>>> regression for gfortran.dg/string_1.f90 due to an additional error >>>> >>>> /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/string_1.f90:13:15: >>>> >>>> print *, len(s) >>>> 1 >>>> Error: Result of LEN overflows its kind at (1) >>>> >>>> No idea why this was not emitted without the patch. >>> >>> Thanks for testing, I'll look into this. Was it on a 32 or 64-bit target? >> >> I can't recreate this on i686-pc-linux-gnu. What host/target are you >> using exactly, is it part of the normal testsuite run or do you >> compile it with some special options? >> >> In any case, that line isn't particularly relevant to what the >> testcase is testing, so it could be removed completely, or by >> specifying kind=8 to len(). >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Janne Blomqvist > > > > -- > Janne Blomqvist
