On Oct 18, 2011, at 4:19 PM, Sharad Singhai <sing...@google.com> wrote: > Okay, I liked the idea of self-descriptive tags. I have updated the > patch based on your suggestions. I have simplified the format > somewhat. Instead of repeating function name, I use a 'function' tag > with the format > > function:<name>,<line number>,<execution count>
Sound nice. > I also dropped the unmangled function names, they were turning out to > be too unreadable and not really useful in this context. Ah, I'd argue for mangled names. Every one knows they can stream through c++filt and get unmangled, but once you unmangle, you can never go back. Also, the mangled version is significantly smaller. For c, it is irrelevant, for c++, it makes a big difference. >
