On 26 January 2018 at 11:25, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 25 Jan 2018, Marc Glisse wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 25 Jan 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >
>> > > --- gcc/match.pd  (revision 257047)
>> > > +++ gcc/match.pd  (working copy)
>> > > @@ -1939,6 +1939,37 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
>> > >      (minus (convert (view_convert:stype @1))
>> > >       (convert (view_convert:stype @2)))))))
>> > >
>> > > +/* (A * C) +- (B * C) -> (A+-B) * C and (A * C) +- A -> A * (C+-1).
>> > > +    Modeled after fold_plusminus_mult_expr.  */
>> > > +(if (!TYPE_SATURATING (type)
>> > > +     && (!FLOAT_TYPE_P (type) || flag_associative_math))
>> > > + (for plusminus (plus minus)
>> > > +  (simplify
>> > > +   (plusminus (mult:s @0 @1) (mult:cs @0 @2))
>> >
>> > No :c on the first mult, so we don't actually handle A*C+B*C?
>>
>> Hmm, I somehow convinced myself that it's only necessary on one
>> of the mults...  but you are of course right.  Will re-test with
>> that fixed.
>
> This is what I have applied.  Note I had to XFAIL a minor part of
> gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-15.c, namely simplifying the final value
> replacement down to n * n.  While the patch should enable this
> the place where the transform could trigger with enough information
> about n is VRP but that doesn't end up folding all stmts - and
> that's something I'm not willing to change right now.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied on trunk.
>

Hi,


I think this patch caused regressions on aarch64:
FAIL: gcc.dg/wmul-1.c scan-tree-dump-not widening_mul "WIDEN_MULT_PLUS_EXPR"

Thanks,

Christophe

> Richard.
>
> 2018-01-26  Richard Biener  <rguent...@suse.de>
>
>         PR tree-optimization/81082
>         * fold-const.c (fold_plusminus_mult_expr): Do not perform the
>         association if it requires casting to unsigned.
>         * match.pd ((A * C) +- (B * C) -> (A+-B)): New patterns derived
>         from fold_plusminus_mult_expr to catch important cases late when
>         range info is available.
>
>         * gcc.dg/vect/pr81082.c: New testcase.
>         * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-15.c: XFAIL the (int)((unsigned)n + -1U) * n + 
> n
>         simplification to n * n.
>
> Index: gcc/fold-const.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/fold-const.c    (revision 257047)
> +++ gcc/fold-const.c    (working copy)
> @@ -7097,7 +7097,7 @@ fold_plusminus_mult_expr (location_t loc
>
>    /* Same may be zero and thus the operation 'code' may overflow.  Likewise
>       same may be minus one and thus the multiplication may overflow.  Perform
> -     the operations in an unsigned type.  */
> +     the sum operation in an unsigned type.  */
>    tree utype = unsigned_type_for (type);
>    tree tem = fold_build2_loc (loc, code, utype,
>                               fold_convert_loc (loc, utype, alt0),
> @@ -7110,9 +7110,9 @@ fold_plusminus_mult_expr (location_t loc
>      return fold_build2_loc (loc, MULT_EXPR, type,
>                             fold_convert (type, tem), same);
>
> -  return fold_convert_loc (loc, type,
> -                          fold_build2_loc (loc, MULT_EXPR, utype, tem,
> -                                           fold_convert_loc (loc, utype, 
> same)));
> +  /* Do not resort to unsigned multiplication because
> +     we lose the no-overflow property of the expression.  */
> +  return NULL_TREE;
>  }
>
>  /* Subroutine of native_encode_expr.  Encode the INTEGER_CST
> Index: gcc/match.pd
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/match.pd        (revision 257047)
> +++ gcc/match.pd        (working copy)
> @@ -1939,6 +1939,37 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
>       (minus (convert (view_convert:stype @1))
>             (convert (view_convert:stype @2)))))))
>
> +/* (A * C) +- (B * C) -> (A+-B) * C and (A * C) +- A -> A * (C+-1).
> +    Modeled after fold_plusminus_mult_expr.  */
> +(if (!TYPE_SATURATING (type)
> +     && (!FLOAT_TYPE_P (type) || flag_associative_math))
> + (for plusminus (plus minus)
> +  (simplify
> +   (plusminus (mult:cs @0 @1) (mult:cs @0 @2))
> +   (if (!ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> +        || TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type)
> +        || (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> +           && tree_expr_nonzero_p (@0)
> +           && expr_not_equal_to (@0, wi::minus_one (TYPE_PRECISION (type)))))
> +    (mult (plusminus @1 @2) @0)))
> +  /* We cannot generate constant 1 for fract.  */
> +  (if (!ALL_FRACT_MODE_P (TYPE_MODE (type)))
> +   (simplify
> +    (plusminus @0 (mult:cs @0 @2))
> +    (if (!ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> +        || TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type)
> +        || (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> +            && tree_expr_nonzero_p (@0)
> +            && expr_not_equal_to (@0, wi::minus_one (TYPE_PRECISION 
> (type)))))
> +     (mult (plusminus { build_one_cst (type); } @2) @0)))
> +   (simplify
> +    (plusminus (mult:cs @0 @2) @0)
> +    (if (!ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> +        || TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type)
> +        || (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> +            && tree_expr_nonzero_p (@0)
> +            && expr_not_equal_to (@0, wi::minus_one (TYPE_PRECISION 
> (type)))))
> +     (mult (plusminus @2 { build_one_cst (type); }) @0))))))
>
>  /* Simplifications of MIN_EXPR, MAX_EXPR, fmin() and fmax().  */
>
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr81082.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr81082.c (revision 0)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr81082.c (working copy)
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
> +
> +int
> +f (int *x, int b1, int b2, int b3)
> +{
> +  int foo = 0;
> +  for (int i1 = 0; i1 < b1; ++i1)
> +    for (int i2 = 0; i2 < b2; ++i2)
> +      for (int i3 = 0; i3 < b3; ++i3)
> +       foo += x[i1 * b2 * b3 + i2 * b3 + (i3 - 1)];
> +  return foo;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "vectorized 1 loops in function" "vect" } } */
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-15.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-15.c     (revision 257048)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-15.c     (working copy)
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ int bla(void)
>  }
>
>  /* Since the loop is removed, there should be no addition.  */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " \\+ " 0 "optimized" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " \\+ " 0 "optimized" { xfail *-*-* } } 
> } */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " \\* " 1 "optimized" } } */
>
>  /* The if from the loop header copying remains in the code.  */

Reply via email to