Thanks. A version of the patch has been commit to 6-branch, 7-branch, and trunk. One regression down, many more to go.
-- steve On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 08:10:41AM +0000, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > Hi Steve, > > That's OK for trunk and, if you are possessed of the intestinal > fortitude, 6- and 7-branches. > > Thanks > > Paul > > > On 7 February 2018 at 02:17, Steve Kargl > <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > The attached patch fixes PR fortran/82049. Prior to this > > patch, gfortran was fouling up the resolution of the charlen > > expression in the testcase. The immediately tries to resolve > > the length while parsing the type-spec. > > > > While here, I've introduced an optimization that causes > > gfc_match_type_spec() to return early if the gfortran isn't > > going to be getting a type-spec. This is done be peeking > > at the next character, if it is in [a-z], the we don't have > > a type spec. OK to commit? > > > > > > 2018-02-06 Steven G. Kargl <ka...@gcc.gnu.org> > > > > PR fortran/82049 > > * match.c (gfc_match_type_spec): If the charlen is non-NULL, then > > try to resolve it. While here return early if possible. > > > > 2018-02-06 Steven G. Kargl <ka...@gcc.gnu.org> > > > > PR fortran/82049 > > * gfortran.dg/assumed_charlen_parameter.f90: New test. > > > > > > -- > > Steve > > > > -- > "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" > - Albert Einstein -- Steve 20170425 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWUpyCsUKR4 20161221 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbCHE-hONow
