On Feb 8, 2018, at 12:36 PM, Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 03:52:27PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote: >> I dusted the pointed to patch off and check it in. Let us know how it goes. > > I wanted to test this on the primary and secondary powerpc targets as > well, but okay.
I reviewed it, and it seemed to only trigger for darwin. Certainly doesn't hurt to run a regression run and ensure that is the case. >> Does this resolve all of PR84113? If so, I can push the bug along. > > It makes bootstrap work. We don't know if it is correct otherwise. So, would be nice if someone could run a regression test. I'd do it by the version just before the breakage, and then drop in the patch, and test again. This minimizes all the other changes. >> What PR was the attachment url from? > > It is not from a PR, and it has never been sent to gcc-patches; it is > from https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2017-01/msg02971.html > (attachment #2). Ah, that explains it. Sounds like 1, 3 and 4 also likely need to go it to make things nice. If someone could regression test and let us know, that's likely the gating factor.