Hi Thomas,

On 16/02/18 10:30, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi Kyrill,

Thanks for the review. Here's my second attempt. I've fixed the typo you raised 
and added some tests (wasn't aware of those). I've also reworked the mapping 
somewhat, it's explain in the description below.


Due to there being no multilib mapping for Armv8-R, default multilib
builts for -march=armv4t with softfloat floating-point arithmetic is
being used. This patch maps it instead to the existing Armv7 multilibs.
Note that mapping for single-precision Armv8-R has been left out due to
there being no Arm implementation of that architecture variant.

Changelog entry is as follows:

*** gcc/ChangeLog ***

2018-02-12  Thomas Preud'homme  <thomas.preudho...@arm.com>

    * config/arm/t-multilib: Map Armv8-R to Armv7 multilibs.


*** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog ***

2018-02-13  Thomas Preud'homme  <thomas.preudho...@arm.com>

    * gcc.target/arm/multilib.exp: Add tests for Armv8-R multilib mappings.


Thanks for fixing this.
This is ok for trunk,
Kyrill

Testing:

Ran -print-multi-directory for all combinations of extensions one can
pass to -march=armv8-r (including no extension but only considering a
single ordering of extension). All gave the expected result. Details in
appendix.
Running multilib.exp is also successful.

Is this ok for stage4?

Best regards,

Thomas

Appendix: output of -print-multi-directory for all extensions available
to -march=armv8-r

% for ext in "" +crc +fp.sp +simd +crypto +crc+fp.sp +crc+simd +crc+crypto +fp.sp+simd 
+fp.sp+crypto +simd+crypto +crc+fp.sp+simd +crc+fp.sp+crypto +crc+simd+crypto +fp.sp+simd+crypto 
+crc+fp.sp+simd+crypto ; do cmd="arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r${ext} -mfloat-abi=soft 
-print-multi-directory" ; echo -n "$cmd: " ; eval $cmd ; done
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r -mfloat-abi=soft -print-multi-directory: 
thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc -mfloat-abi=soft -print-multi-directory: 
thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+fp.sp -mfloat-abi=soft -print-multi-directory: 
thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+simd -mfloat-abi=soft -print-multi-directory: 
thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crypto -mfloat-abi=soft 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+fp.sp -mfloat-abi=soft 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+simd -mfloat-abi=soft 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+crypto -mfloat-abi=soft 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+fp.sp+simd -mfloat-abi=soft 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+fp.sp+crypto -mfloat-abi=soft 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+simd+crypto -mfloat-abi=soft 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+fp.sp+simd -mfloat-abi=soft 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+fp.sp+crypto -mfloat-abi=soft 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+simd+crypto -mfloat-abi=soft 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+fp.sp+simd+crypto -mfloat-abi=soft 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+fp.sp+simd+crypto -mfloat-abi=soft 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7/nofp

% for ext in "" +crc +fp.sp +simd +crypto +crc+fp.sp +crc+simd +crc+crypto +fp.sp+simd 
+fp.sp+crypto +simd+crypto +crc+fp.sp+simd +crc+fp.sp+crypto +crc+simd+crypto +fp.sp+simd+crypto 
+crc+fp.sp+simd+crypto ; do cmd="arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r${ext} -mfloat-abi=softfp 
-print-multi-directory" ; echo -n "$cmd: " ; eval $cmd ; done
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r -mfloat-abi=softfp -print-multi-directory: 
thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc -mfloat-abi=softfp -print-multi-directory: 
thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+fp.sp -mfloat-abi=softfp 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+simd -mfloat-abi=softfp 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/softfp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crypto -mfloat-abi=softfp 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/softfp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+fp.sp -mfloat-abi=softfp 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7/nofp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+simd -mfloat-abi=softfp 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/softfp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+crypto -mfloat-abi=softfp 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/softfp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+fp.sp+simd -mfloat-abi=softfp 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/softfp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+fp.sp+crypto -mfloat-abi=softfp 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/softfp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+simd+crypto -mfloat-abi=softfp 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/softfp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+fp.sp+simd -mfloat-abi=softfp 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/softfp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+fp.sp+crypto -mfloat-abi=softfp 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/softfp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+simd+crypto -mfloat-abi=softfp 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/softfp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+fp.sp+simd+crypto -mfloat-abi=softfp 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/softfp
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+fp.sp+simd+crypto -mfloat-abi=softfp 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/softfp

% for ext in "" +crc +fp.sp +simd +crypto +crc+fp.sp +crc+simd +crc+crypto +fp.sp+simd 
+fp.sp+crypto +simd+crypto +crc+fp.sp+simd +crc+fp.sp+crypto +crc+simd+crypto +fp.sp+simd+crypto 
+crc+fp.sp+simd+crypto ; do cmd="arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r${ext} -mfloat-abi=hard 
-print-multi-directory" ; echo -n "$cmd: " ; eval $cmd ; done
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r -mfloat-abi=hard -print-multi-directory: .
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc -mfloat-abi=hard -print-multi-directory: .
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+fp.sp -mfloat-abi=hard -print-multi-directory: 
.
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+simd -mfloat-abi=hard -print-multi-directory: 
thumb/v7+fp/hard
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crypto -mfloat-abi=hard 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/hard
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+fp.sp -mfloat-abi=hard 
-print-multi-directory: .
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+simd -mfloat-abi=hard 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/hard
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+crypto -mfloat-abi=hard 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/hard
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+fp.sp+simd -mfloat-abi=hard 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/hard
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+fp.sp+crypto -mfloat-abi=hard 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/hard
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+simd+crypto -mfloat-abi=hard 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/hard
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+fp.sp+simd -mfloat-abi=hard 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/hard
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+fp.sp+crypto -mfloat-abi=hard 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/hard
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+simd+crypto -mfloat-abi=hard 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/hard
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+fp.sp+simd+crypto -mfloat-abi=hard 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/hard
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-r+crc+fp.sp+simd+crypto -mfloat-abi=hard 
-print-multi-directory: thumb/v7+fp/hard

On 13/02/18 10:27, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Thomas,

On 13/02/18 10:24, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi,

Due to there being no multilib mapping for Armv8-R, default multilib
targeting -march=armv4t with softfloat floating-point arithmetic is
being used. This patch maps it instead to the existing Armv7 multilibs.
Note that since there is no single-precision multilib compatible with
R profile, -march=armv8-r+fp.sp is mapped to -march=armv7 ie. Armv7
with softfloat floating-point.


Thanks for doing this.

Changelog entry is as follows:

*** gcc/ChangeLog ***

2018-02-12  Thomas Preud'homme <thomas.preudho...@arm.com>

        * config/arm/t-multilib: Map Armv8-R to Armv7 multilibs.

Testing:

Ran -print-multi-directory for all combinations of extensions one can
pass to -march=armv8-r (including no extension but only considering a
single ordering of extension). All gave the expected result. Details in
appendix.

Is this ok for stage4?

Best regards,

Thomas

Appendix: output of -print-multi-directory for all extensions available
to -march=armv8-r


Can you please add a representative subset of these as tests to 
gcc.target/arm/multilib.exp.
That way we can have the peace of mind that they have sane mappings as we go 
forward.

<snip, thanks for the results>

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/t-multilib b/gcc/config/arm/t-multilib
index 
2f790097670e1bf81b56b069a6b1582763aab6e9..cd5927a7c9ec053b4d5b9725f7b30daeca3b1aa3
 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/t-multilib
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/t-multilib
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ v8_a_simd_variants    := $(call all_feat_combs, simd crypto)
  v8_1_a_simd_variants    := $(call all_feat_combs, simd crypto)
  v8_2_a_simd_variants    := $(call all_feat_combs, simd fp16 fp16fml crypto 
dotprod)
  v8_4_a_simd_variants    := $(call all_feat_combs, simd fp16 crypto)
+v8_r_nosimd_variants    := $(call all_feat_combs, crc fp.sp)

  ifneq (,$(HAS_APROFILE))
  include $(srcdir)/config/arm/t-aprofile
@@ -105,6 +106,20 @@ MULTILIB_MATCHES    += march?armv7+fp=march?armv7-r+fp+idiv

  MULTILIB_MATCHES    += $(foreach ARCH, $(all_early_arch), \
                   march?armv5te+fp=march?$(ARCH)+fp)
+#
+# Armv8-r: map down onto common v7 code.


Please use Armv8-R.



  +# Note 1: there is no single-precision armv7 multilib so +fp.sp is mapped
+# down to softfloat armv7 (second MULTILIB_MATCHES).
+# Note 2: +fp.sp being a subset of +simd and +crypto, there is no need to
+# consider the combination of +fp.sp with a simd extension since matching
+# is run after canonicalization
+MULTILIB_MATCHES    += march?armv7=march?armv8-r
+MULTILIB_MATCHES    += $(foreach ARCH, $(v8_r_nosimd_variants), \
+                 march?armv7=march?armv8-r$(ARCH))
+MULTILIB_MATCHES    += $(foreach ARCH,+simd +crypto, \
+                 march?armv7+fp=march?armv8-r$(ARCH) \
+                 march?armv7+fp=march?armv8-r+crc$(ARCH))
+

  ifeq (,$(HAS_APROFILE))
  # Map all v7-a



Reply via email to