"Sebastian Perta" <sebastian.pe...@renesas.com> writes: > Is this similar to what you had in mind?
Yes. Did it affect code size in any of the larger tests? I was hoping that it wouldn't force too much into 8-bit registers and cause more moves to be needed elsewhere. (and even if it didn't, I think this one feels "more correct" than the other, as it retains more of the "I'm 16 bits"-ness of the operand) >> If it doesn't work out, consider this patch approved, though. > Can I checkin now? Yes. Thanks! Make sure the indentation is correct, of course. It wasn't in the email, and that confused me at first.
