On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:12 PM, James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 01:35:56PM +0000, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >> Jakub commented here that >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg01325.html we don't turn >> on fasynchronous-unwind-tables for AArch64. I note that x86_64 turns on >> funwind-tables as well. Thus this patch turns on both. >> >> Note that this doesn't increase code size but will likely increase >> binary size because we now have a lot more eh_frame / debug_frame >> information being spat out. We probably need to do get the clang /llvm >> guys to do the same but I'll prod them separately. >> >> Bootstrapped and regression tested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu. >> >> Ok ? > > OK. >
Now applied. Maybe the FreeBSD guys want to do the same but that's their choice ? CC'ing Andreas just in case he has an opinion. Ramana > Thanks, > James >
