On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/24/2011 02:47 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>>
>> What about (testcase)
>>
>> int f(char);
>> double f(...);
>>
>> const int n = sizeof f({257});
>>
>> ?
>
> The narrowing conversion would be marked as 'bad' and therefore the second
> overload chosen. As before, the objective is to only change the diagnostic,
> not the meaning of valid code.
>OK. I think we may need better documentation of the behavior.
