Richard Earnshaw wrote: >>> Which doesn't appear to have been approved. Did you follow up with Jeff? >> >> I'll get back to that one at some point - it'll take some time to agree on a >> way >> forward with the callback. >> >> Wilco >> >> > > So it seems to me that this should then be queued until that is resolved.
Why? The patch as is doesn't at all depend on the resolution of how to improve the callback. If we stopped all patches until GCC is 100% perfect we'd never make any progress. Wilco
