On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:30:58AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 24/05/18 18:28, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:07:18AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > >> On 22/05/18 22:21, Jeff Law wrote: > >>> On 05/21/2018 03:46 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >>>> This patch creates "be" and "le" selectors, which can be used by all > >>>> architectures, similar to ilp32 and lp64. > > > >>>> 2017-05-21 Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> > >>>> > >>>> gcc/testsuite/ > >>>> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_be): New. > >>>> (check_effective_target_le): New. > >>> I think this is fine. "be" "le" are used all over the place in gcc and > >>> the kernel to denote big/little endian. > >> > >> except when el and eb are used for perversity... :-) > > > > It should have been -BE and -EL, because that is what it means. That > > also avoids the -l/-L problem -le and -LE would have ;-) > > > > (Confusing? Yes, little-endian is confusing). > > I beg to differ. Big endian is the confusing one... :-)
I thought you said -EL is perverse. Maybe I misunderstood! (Sorry sorry). Segher
