Hi Jonathan,
> No objection to this patch, but I'll just note that we have
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81091 suggesting we
> should use LFS for libstdc++ unconditionally.
seems like a wise move to me. The libstdc++.so ABI didn't change on
Solaris either (that possibility had caused concern for me initially);
didn't check libstdc++fs.a though.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
