Hi Jonathan,

>       PR libstdc++/70940
>       * include/experimental/memory_resource (__resource_adaptor_common):
>       New base class.
>       (__resource_adaptor_common::_AlignMgr): Helper for obtaining aligned
>       pointer from unaligned, and vice versa.
>       (__resource_adaptor_imp::do_allocate): Use _AlignMgr to adjust
>       allocated pointer to meet alignment request.
>       (__resource_adaptor_imp::do_deallocate): Use _AlignMgr to retrieve
>       original pointer for deallocation.
>       (__resource_adaptor_imp::do_is_equal): Reformat.
>       (__resource_adaptor_imp::_S_aligned_size): Remove.
>       (__resource_adaptor_imp::_S_supported): Remove.
>       (new_delete_resource): Use __gnu_cxx::new_allocator.
>       * testsuite/experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc: Test
>       extended alignments and use debug_allocator to check for matching
>       allocate/deallocate pairs.
>
> Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk. This is more experimental TS
> material, so I'll probably backport it.

this patch has cause a couple of FAILures on 32-bit targets/multilibs.
I'm seeing it on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and sparc-sun-solaris2.11, with
gcc-testresults postings to the same effect for
i586-unknown-freebsd10.4, i686-pc-linux-gnu, s390x-ibm-linux-gnu,
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu:

+FAIL: experimental/memory_resource/1.cc (test for excess errors)
+FAIL: experimental/memory_resource/70966.cc (test for excess errors)
+FAIL: experimental/memory_resource/null_memory_resource.cc (test for excess 
errors)
+FAIL: experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc (test for excess errors)
+XPASS: experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc execution test
+FAIL: experimental/type_erased_allocator/2.cc (test for excess errors)

FAIL: experimental/type_erased_allocator/2.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/var/gcc/regression/trunk/11.4-gcc/build/i386-pc-solaris2.11/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/memory_resource:329:
 warning: left shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]

        Rainer

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University

Reply via email to