This has been committed to trunk.
Is this ok to backport to gcc6, gcc7, and gcc8?
Thanks.
On 6/19/18 2:30 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:29:55AM -0500, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
>> +/* A single vpkudus matches twice because this is compiled with -dp,
>> + causing diagnostic comments to appear in the resulting .s file, one
>> + of which matches vpkudus. */
>
> -dp prints the name of the instruction pattern, which is altivec_vpkudus.
> So if you look for the full word instead, this problem isn't there I
> think?
>
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpkudus" 2 } } */
>
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mvpkudus\M} 1 } } */
>
> Okay with that change (and comment changes). Thanks!
>
>
> Segher
>
>
