On 18/06/18 09:08, Andre Simoes Dias Vieira wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> Sorry for the delay I have been on holidays.  I had a look and I think you 
> are right.  With these changes Umq and Uml seem to have the same 
> functionality though, so I would suggest using only one.  Maybe use a 
> different name for both, removing both Umq and Uml in favour of Umn, where 
> the n indicates it narrows the addressing mode.  How does that sound to you?
> 
> I also had a look at Ump, but that one is used in the parallel pattern for 
> STP/LDP which does not use this "narrowing". So we should leave that one as 
> is.
> 
> Cheers,
> Andre
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 12:28:16 PM
> To: Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd
> Subject: Re: [AArch64][PATCH 1/2] Fix addressing printing of LDP/STP
> 
> Andre Simoes Dias Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com> writes:
>> @@ -5716,10 +5717,17 @@ aarch64_classify_address (struct 
>> aarch64_address_info *info,
>>    unsigned int vec_flags = aarch64_classify_vector_mode (mode);
>>    bool advsimd_struct_p = (vec_flags == (VEC_ADVSIMD | VEC_STRUCT));
>>    bool load_store_pair_p = (type == ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP
>> +                         || type == ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP_N
>>                           || mode == TImode
>>                           || mode == TFmode
>>                           || (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN && advsimd_struct_p));
>>
>> +  /* If we are dealing with ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP_N that means the incoming 
>> mode
>> +     corresponds to the actual size of the memory being loaded/stored and 
>> the
>> +     mode of the corresponding addressing mode is half of that.  */
>> +  if (type == ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP_N && known_eq (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode), 16))
>> +    mode = DFmode;
>> +
>>    bool allow_reg_index_p = (!load_store_pair_p
>>                           && (known_lt (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode), 16)
>>                               || vec_flags == VEC_ADVSIMD
> 
> I don't know whether it matters in practice, but that description also
> applies to Umq, not just Uml.  It might be worth changing it too so
> that things stay consistent.
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard
> 
Hi all,

This is a reworked patched, replacing Umq and Uml with Umn now.

Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu.

Is this OK for trunk?

gcc
2018-06-25  Andre Vieira  <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>

        * config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (aarch64_simd_mov<VQ:mode>):
Replace
        Umq with Umn.
        (store_pair_lanes<mode>): Likewise.
        * config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (aarch64_addr_query_type): Add new
        enum value 'ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP_N'.
        * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_addr_query_type): Likewise.
        (aarch64_print_address_internal): Add declaration.
        (aarch64_print_ldpstp_address): Remove.
        (aarch64_classify_address): Adapt mode for 'ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP_N'.
        (aarch64_print_operand): Change printing of 'y'.
        * config/aarch64/predicates.md (aarch64_mem_pair_lanes_operand): Use
        new enum value 'ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP_N', don't hardcode mode and use
        'true' rather than '1'.
        * gcc/config/aarch64/constraints.md (Uml): Likewise.
        (Uml): Rename to Umn.
        (Umq): Remove.
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h
index 4ea50acaa59c0b58a213bd1f27fb78b6d8deee96..c03a442107815eed44a3b6bceb386d78a6615483 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h
@@ -120,6 +120,10 @@ enum aarch64_symbol_type
    ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP
       Query what is valid for a load/store pair.
 
+   ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP_N
+      Query what is valid for a load/store pair, but narrow the incoming mode
+      for address checking.  This is used for the store_pair_lanes patterns.
+
    ADDR_QUERY_ANY
       Query what is valid for at least one memory constraint, which may
       allow things that "m" doesn't.  For example, the SVE LDR and STR
@@ -128,6 +132,7 @@ enum aarch64_symbol_type
 enum aarch64_addr_query_type {
   ADDR_QUERY_M,
   ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP,
+  ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP_N,
   ADDR_QUERY_ANY
 };
 
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
index 4e5c42b0f15b863f3088dba4aac450f31ca309bb..7936581947b360a6d6a88ce6523bbb804c3eb89c 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
 
 (define_insn "*aarch64_simd_mov<VQ:mode>"
   [(set (match_operand:VQ 0 "nonimmediate_operand"
-		"=w, Umq,  m,  w, ?r, ?w, ?r, w")
+		"=w, Umn,  m,  w, ?r, ?w, ?r, w")
 	(match_operand:VQ 1 "general_operand"
 		"m,  Dz, w,  w,  w,  r,  r, Dn"))]
   "TARGET_SIMD
@@ -3059,7 +3059,7 @@
 )
 
 (define_insn "store_pair_lanes<mode>"
-  [(set (match_operand:<VDBL> 0 "aarch64_mem_pair_lanes_operand" "=Uml, Uml")
+  [(set (match_operand:<VDBL> 0 "aarch64_mem_pair_lanes_operand" "=Umn, Umn")
 	(vec_concat:<VDBL>
 	   (match_operand:VDC 1 "register_operand" "w, r")
 	   (match_operand:VDC 2 "register_operand" "w, r")))]
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
index c94f7093b0880aee17a4f9b7a3a60b2c27a62f98..1e702248c51c61ac881c1a47a3a509f718823de1 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
@@ -206,7 +206,8 @@ static bool aarch64_builtin_support_vector_misalignment (machine_mode mode,
 							 int misalignment,
 							 bool is_packed);
 static machine_mode aarch64_simd_container_mode (scalar_mode, poly_int64);
-static bool aarch64_print_ldpstp_address (FILE *, machine_mode, rtx);
+static bool aarch64_print_address_internal (FILE*, machine_mode, rtx,
+					    aarch64_addr_query_type);
 
 /* Major revision number of the ARM Architecture implemented by the target.  */
 unsigned aarch64_architecture_version;
@@ -5716,10 +5717,18 @@ aarch64_classify_address (struct aarch64_address_info *info,
   unsigned int vec_flags = aarch64_classify_vector_mode (mode);
   bool advsimd_struct_p = (vec_flags == (VEC_ADVSIMD | VEC_STRUCT));
   bool load_store_pair_p = (type == ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP
+			    || type == ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP_N
 			    || mode == TImode
 			    || mode == TFmode
 			    || (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN && advsimd_struct_p));
 
+  /* If we are dealing with ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP_N that means the incoming mode
+     corresponds to the actual size of the memory being loaded/stored and the
+     mode of the corresponding addressing mode is half of that.  */
+  if (type == ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP_N
+      && known_eq (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode), 16))
+    mode = DFmode;
+
   bool allow_reg_index_p = (!load_store_pair_p
 			    && (known_lt (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode), 16)
 				|| vec_flags == VEC_ADVSIMD
@@ -7094,13 +7103,10 @@ aarch64_print_operand (FILE *f, rtx x, int code)
 	    return;
 	  }
 
-	if (code == 'y')
-	  /* LDP/STP which uses a single double-width memory operand.
-	     Adjust the mode to appear like a typical LDP/STP.
-	     Currently this is supported for 16-byte accesses only.  */
-	  mode = DFmode;
-
-	if (!aarch64_print_ldpstp_address (f, mode, XEXP (x, 0)))
+	if (!aarch64_print_address_internal (f, mode, XEXP (x, 0),
+					    code == 'y'
+					    ? ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP_N
+					    : ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP))
 	  output_operand_lossage ("invalid operand prefix '%%%c'", code);
       }
       break;
@@ -7223,13 +7229,6 @@ aarch64_print_address_internal (FILE *f, machine_mode mode, rtx x,
   return false;
 }
 
-/* Print address 'x' of a LDP/STP with mode 'mode'.  */
-static bool
-aarch64_print_ldpstp_address (FILE *f, machine_mode mode, rtx x)
-{
-  return aarch64_print_address_internal (f, mode, x, ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP);
-}
-
 /* Print address 'x' of a memory access with mode 'mode'.  */
 static void
 aarch64_print_operand_address (FILE *f, machine_mode mode, rtx x)
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/constraints.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/constraints.md
index 32a0fa60a198c714f7c0b8b987da6bc26992845d..72cacdabdac52dcb40b480f7a5bfbf4997c742d8 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/constraints.md
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/constraints.md
@@ -218,14 +218,6 @@
  (and (match_code "mem")
       (match_test "REG_P (XEXP (op, 0))")))
 
-(define_memory_constraint "Umq"
-  "@internal
-   A memory address which uses a base register with an offset small enough for
-   a load/store pair operation in DI mode."
-   (and (match_code "mem")
-	(match_test "aarch64_legitimate_address_p (DImode, XEXP (op, 0), false,
-						   ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP)")))
-
 (define_memory_constraint "Ump"
   "@internal
   A memory address suitable for a load/store pair operation."
@@ -233,14 +225,16 @@
        (match_test "aarch64_legitimate_address_p (GET_MODE (op), XEXP (op, 0),
 						  true, ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP)")))
 
-;; Used for storing two 64-bit values in an AdvSIMD register using an STP
-;; as a 128-bit vec_concat.
-(define_memory_constraint "Uml"
+;; Used for storing or loading pairs in an AdvSIMD register using an STP/LDP
+;; as a vector-concat.  The address mode uses the same constraints as if it
+;; were for a single value.
+(define_memory_constraint "Umn"
   "@internal
   A memory address suitable for a load/store pair operation."
   (and (match_code "mem")
-       (match_test "aarch64_legitimate_address_p (DFmode, XEXP (op, 0), 1,
-						  ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP)")))
+       (match_test "aarch64_legitimate_address_p (GET_MODE (op), XEXP (op, 0),
+						  true,
+						  ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP_N)")))
 
 (define_memory_constraint "Utr"
   "@internal
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/predicates.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/predicates.md
index 7aec76d681f5eca87b7b5e1d63d12dc0205ad113..f0917af8b4cec945ba4e38e4dc670200f8812983 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/predicates.md
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/predicates.md
@@ -226,8 +226,9 @@
 ;; as a 128-bit vec_concat.
 (define_predicate "aarch64_mem_pair_lanes_operand"
   (and (match_code "mem")
-       (match_test "aarch64_legitimate_address_p (DFmode, XEXP (op, 0), 1,
-						  ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP)")))
+       (match_test "aarch64_legitimate_address_p (GET_MODE (op), XEXP (op, 0),
+						  true,
+						  ADDR_QUERY_LDP_STP_N)")))
 
 (define_predicate "aarch64_prefetch_operand"
   (match_test "aarch64_address_valid_for_prefetch_p (op, false)"))

Reply via email to