On 17/07/18 12:09, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > > On 02/02/18 15:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: >> >> On 01/02/18 17:26, Joseph Myers wrote: >>> On Thu, 1 Feb 2018, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Joseph, aarch64 maintainers, >>>> >>>> On 28/09/17 13:31, Joseph Myers wrote: >>>>> Many GCC tests fail for AArch64 with current binutils because of >>>>> assembler warnings of the form "Warning: ignoring incorrect section >>>>> type for .init_array.00100". The same issue was fixed for ARM in >>>>> r247015 by using SECTION_NOTYPE when creating those sections; this >>>>> patch applies the same fix to AArch64. >>>>> >>>>> Tested with no regressions with cross to aarch64-linux-gnu. OK to >>>>> commit? >>>> There is a user request to backport this patch to the GCC 7 and 6 >>>> branches: PR 84168. >>>> >>>> Would that be acceptable? >>> I don't object, but I'm not aware of this being a regression. >> >> I think it's been present since the beginning of the port so >> it's not a regression, just a user request for a bugfix backport. >> >> The patch applies, bootstraps and tests cleanly on both branches FWIW. >> > > Gentle ping on this (I had almost forgotten about it). > Do the aarch64 maintainers mind this patch being packported to the GCC 7 > and 6 branches? > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00054.html > > Thanks, > Kyrill > >
It looks pretty safe to me. OK unless the RMs object. R.
