On 17/08/18 22:46 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On 17 August 2018 at 22:29, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
That was added by https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2016-12/msg00122.html
but I see no justification for that in the standard (and neither
libc++ nor MSFTL does anything special here, so they fail the test
too).
Ville, I'm no longer convinced by your rationale. Why is that
You mean the part where I said "the variadic constructor doesn't run
into this problem"?
Yes. Either we shouldn't constrain our 2-tuple partial specialization,
or the standard should require it for the sizeof...(Types)==2 case.
I may have been wrong about the variadic.
On 17/08/18 22:47 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
So yes, I strongly think we should report a defect.
OK, I'll do that.
