Hi, On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > struct foo
> > {
> > unsigned a : 21;
> > union x1 { char x; };
> > unsigned b : 11;
> > union x1 u;
> > };
>
> (for C++) this happens to be a case we already get right. <aside> I think
> that'd be a C vendor extension, I don't think unnamed fields are permitted
> there?
Anonymous structures and unions are in C11 (and before that a widely
accepted extension).
Ciao,
Michael.
