On 11/02/2011 07:18 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> OK, I think i need to revert my position and introduce
> __atomic_test_and_set() and __atomic_clear().  bah.  I'll work on
> that today.

I don't think you do.  We already have the __sync functions,
and we should just use those.

What we need is a preprocessor flag that tells you that you
need to use those older sync routines.


r~

Reply via email to