On 09/06/2018 04:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/06/2018 04:01 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 09/06/2018 11:12 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> >>>> >>> >>> Ah, thanks a lot. >>> >>> Okay, this is the status of the STRING-CST semantic-v2 patches: >>> >>> [PATCH] Check the STRING_CSTs in varasm.c >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg01569.html >>> => Unfortunately I forgot to change the Title to [PATCHv2] or so. >>> Should I send a ping for this one? >>> >>> [PATCHv2] Handle overlength strings in the C FE >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg01566.html >>> => Should I send a ping for this one? >> No need to ping. I've got it here. What's odd is that it's regressing >> 87053 . > Which is probably a sign that we've got an incorrect test for NUL > termination somewhere. I think I've found the issue. I've got more testing to do, but looks like a thinko on my part.
jeff
