On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 at 11:49, Kyrill Tkachov
<kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 13/09/18 10:25, Sam Tebbs wrote:
> >
> > On 09/11/2018 04:20 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 10:13:43AM -0500, Sam Tebbs wrote:
> > >> Hi James,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for the feedback. Here is an update with the changes you proposed
> > >> and an updated changelog.
> > >>
> > >> gcc/
> > >> 2018-09-04  Sam Tebbs  <sam.te...@arm.com>
> > >>
> > >>           PR target/85628
> > >>           * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (*aarch64_bfxil):
> > >>           Define.
> > >>           * config/aarch64/constraints.md (Ulc): Define
> > >>           * config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h 
> > >> (aarch64_high_bits_all_ones_p):
> > >>           Define.
> > >>           * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_high_bits_all_ones_p): New 
> > >> function.
> > >>
> > >> gcc/testsuite
> > >> 2018-09-04  Sam Tebbs  <sam.te...@arm.com>
> > >>
> > >>           PR target/85628
> > >>           * gcc.target/aarch64/combine_bfxil.c: New file.
> > >>           * gcc.target/aarch64/combine_bfxil_2.c: New file.
> > >>
> > >>
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > >> +/* Return true if I's bits are consecutive ones from the MSB.  */
> > >> +bool
> > >> +aarch64_high_bits_all_ones_p (HOST_WIDE_INT i)
> > >> +{
> > >> +  return exact_log2(-i) != HOST_WIDE_INT_M1;
> > >> +}
> > > You need a space in here between the function name and the bracket:
> > >
> > >    exact_log2 (-i)
> > >
> > >
> > >> +extern void abort(void);
> > > The same comment applies multiple places in this file.
> > >
> > > Likewise; if (
> > >
> > > Otherwise, OK, please apply with those fixes.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > James
> >
> > Thanks for noticing that, here's the fixed version.
> >
>
> Thanks Sam, I've committed the patch on your behalf with r264264.
> If you want to get write-after-approval access to the SVN repo to commit 
> patches yourself in the future
> please fill out the form at https://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/pdw/ps_form.cgi 
> putting my address from the MAINTAINERS file as the approver.
>

Hi,

You've probably already noticed by now since you fixed the
combine_bfi_1 issue introduced by this commit, but it add another
regression:
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/copysign-bsl.c scan-assembler b(sl|it|if)\tv[0-9]

Christophe

> Kyrill
>
> > Sam
>

Reply via email to