On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 02:38:52PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:21:06PM +0000, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > The Linux kernel people want a feature that makes GCC pretend some > > inline assembler code is tiny (while it would think it is huge), so > > that such code will be inlined essentially always instead of > > essentially never. > > Just a minor comment, shouldn't we accept both > asm volatile inline (...) > and > asm inline volatile (...) > ordering (probably still require that goto if present must be last)?
For C volatile is a type-qualifier, which makes the syntax more complex if we would handle it as you suggest. It can be done of course. I followed the example of goto as you say, which cannot go before volatile either. Segher
