Patch for the PR70149 regression committed as revision 265263. Likewise the patch for PR58618 has been committed as revision 265264.
Cheers Paul On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 22:17, Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > > This problem concerned associate targets being substrings. It turns > > out that they are returned as pointer types (with a different cast for > > unity based substrings ***sigh***) and so can be assigned directly to > > the associate name. The patch quite simply removed the condition that > > such targets be allocatable, pointer or dummy. > > I noticed in the course of working up the testcase that > > character (:), pointer :: ptr => NULL() > > character (6), target :: tgt = 'lmnopq' > > ptr => tgt > > print *, len (ptr), ptr > > end > > ICEs on the NULL initialization of the pointer but works fine if this > > is removed. Has this already been posted as a PR? > > > I leave it to Dominique to search for a PR; otherwise, I believe the > attach patch fixes the issue. – It just needs someone to package it with > a test case, regtest and commit it. > > > > Bootstrapped and regtested on FC28/x86_64 - OK for trunk? > > OK – thanks for the fix. > > Tobias > > > 2018-10-17 Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org> > > > > PR fortran/58618 > > * trans-stmt.c (trans_associate_var): All strings that return > > as pointer types can be assigned directly to the associate > > name so remove 'attr' and the condition that uses it. > > > > 2018-10-17 Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org> > > > > PR fortran/58618 > > * gfortran.dg/associate_45.f90 : New test. -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein