On 11/08/2018 08:34 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:44:44PM +0000, Sam Tebbs wrote: >> Does your patch fix the incorrect generation of "scvtf s1, s1"? I was >> looking at the issue as well and don't want to do any overlapping work. > I don't know. Well, there are no incorrect code issues I know of at all > now; but you mean that it is taking an instruction more than you would > like to see, I suppose? > > > Segher
Yes I am referring to the extra instruction generated, which is incorrect generation in my opinion since it shouldn't be generated.
