On 11/15/18 4:38 AM, Robin Dapp wrote:
>> This looks pretty reasonable.  ISTM it ought to be able to go forward if
>> it's tested independently.
> 
> The test suite already passes, any other tests you have in mind?  To be
> honest I suppose noce_convert_multiple_sets will currently never
> successfully return (due to the costing problems I described before), so
> a specific test case might be difficult.
There can be subtle dependencies on prior patches when you test it as
part of a set.  If we're going to gate this in independently, then it
should be tested independently.

Jeff

Reply via email to