Hi, On Fri, 7 Dec 2018, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:12 AM Nick Clifton <ni...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Is the patch OK with you ? > > > > > > > This caused: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88409 > > > > Here is the fix. OK for trunk? I think this points toward the limit being _much_ too low. With template meta programming you easily get these mangled names, it's not even a particularly long one. But I'm wondering a bit, without tracing the demangler, just looking at the symbol name and demangled result I don't readily see where the depth of recursion really is more than 1024, are there perhaps some recursion_level-- statements skipped? Ciao, Michael.