On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 11:18:03PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 03:20:02AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > Hi Alan, > > > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:39:27AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:05:57AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:40:01AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > > > > > Since I broke powerpc*-freebsd and the other non-linux powerpc > > > > > targets, I guess I ought to fix them. The following is a variation on > > > > > your first patch, that results in -mcall-linux for powerpc-freebsd* > > > > > providing the 32-bit powerpc-linux dynamic linker. > > > > > > > > That, like the first patch, abuses that header file. Please do it > > > > somewhere sane instead, not in a random subtarget file? > > > > > > Is there is a better place, currently? sysv4.h contains a mess of OS > > > related defines already, to support various -mcall options. If those > > > stay in sysv4.h I can't see a better place for the fall-back > > > GNU_USER_DYNAMIC_LINKER define. > > > > I was hoping you would untangle it a bit. My dastardly plan failed, > > apparently. Drat. > > Me untangling some of the linux bits was what caused the problem.. > > I think that -mcall-linux, -mcall-freebsd, -mcall-netbsd and > -mcall-openbsd should be deprecated. That would make it possible to > put the OS specific defines where they belong.
Does anyone still use those options? A patch to remove them is welcome. Segher
