On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 02:09:28PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> Changed that. I verified that tree-ssa.exp tests work fine. May I install the
> hunk you suggested
> without testing?
I think better would be commit without that hunk and when you bootstrap next
time, test that and commit (preapproved) that hunk.
That said, have you looked at the other mail I've posted (TYPE_PRECISION
(index_type) > TYPE_PRECISION (elt0))?
The way contains_linear_function_p is written it does the checks in the type
that will do it at runtime, so I'm just wondering if there are cases where
doing it in the wider type could optimize something that the narrower one
can't. Perhaps there are none.
Jakub
