On 1/16/19 4:48 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
This PR reports a bug where we select a non-const operator function and
then apply it to a const object. That's happening because the
expression 'c[0]' is not dependent, so we figure end up resolving it.
But the lambda capture logic doesn't capture 'c' at that point and we
have a non-const qualified 'c'. At instantiation time we do the capture
and the by-value lambda results in const-qualified captures.
Jason, the orginal test in process_outer_var_ref looked a little funky
-- why not just processing_template_decl? That would satisfy what the
comment says it checking. Anyway changing the test to check DECL's
type-dependency makes the right things happen, and a bootstrap passes.
Could you review please.
Hmm, I don't remember exactly my rationale for deferring captures within
a template, but if this doesn't obviously break anything it seems
reasonable. Go ahead.
Jason
