On 1/23/19 4:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:10:38PM +0000, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> --- gcc/c-family/c-warn.c    (revision 268119)
>> +++ gcc/c-family/c-warn.c    (working copy)
>> @@ -2796,6 +2796,10 @@ check_address_or_pointer_of_packed_membe
>>        if (context)
>>          break;
>>      }
>> +      if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (rhs)) == ARRAY_TYPE)
>> +    rvalue = false;
>> +      if (rvalue)
>> +    return NULL_TREE;
> 
> That looks like ARRAY_REF specific stuff, isn't it?  We have various other
> handled components, does e.g. REALPART_EXPR/IMAGPART_EXPR need that?
> What about VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR?  Or is that something you want to do for
> all of them?  In any case, there should be testcases with _Complex and
> __real__/__imag__, address of that as well as value.
> 
>> @@ -52,4 +54,6 @@ void foo (void)
>>    i1 = t0.d;                 /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned 
>> pointer value" } */
>>    i1 = t1->d;                /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned 
>> pointer value" } */
>>    i1 = t10[0].d;             /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned 
>> pointer value" } */
>> +  i1 = (int*) &t10[0].e[0];  /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned 
>> pointer value" } */
>> +  i1 = (int*) t10[0].e;      /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned 
>> pointer value" } */
> 
> Why not also i1 = &t10[0].e[0];
> and i1 = t10[0].e; tests?
> 
> Unrelated to this patch, I'm worried e.g. about
>   if (INDIRECT_REF_P (rhs))
>     rhs = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0);
>    
> at the start of the check_address_or_pointer_of_packed_member
> function, what if we have:
>   i1 = *&t0.c;
> Do we want to warn when in the end we don't care if the address is unaligned
> or not, this is folded eventually into t0.c.
> 
> Plus as I said earlier to H.J., I think
>   bool nop_p;
> 
>   while (TREE_CODE (rhs) == COMPOUND_EXPR)
>     rhs = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 1);
> 
>   tree orig_rhs = rhs;
>   STRIP_NOPS (rhs);
>   nop_p = orig_rhs != rhs;
> should be really:
>   bool nop_p;
>   tree orig_rhs = rhs;
>   STRIP_NOPS (rhs);
>   nop_p = orig_rhs != rhs;
> 
>   while (TREE_CODE (rhs) == COMPOUND_EXPR)
>     rhs = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 1);
> 
>   orig_rhs = rhs;
>   STRIP_NOPS (rhs);
>   nop_p |= orig_rhs != rhs;
> 
> or similar, because if there are casts around COMPOUND_EXPR, it doesn't than
> look through those COMPOUND_EXPRs, and if e.g. in the COMPOUND_EXPR rhs
> there is then COND_EXPR or similar, it should handle that case.
> 

Okay, I updated the patch to address your comments.

Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Is it OK for trunk?


Thanks
Bernd.
Index: gcc/c-family/c-warn.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/c-family/c-warn.c	(revision 268195)
+++ gcc/c-family/c-warn.c	(working copy)
@@ -2725,14 +2725,18 @@ static tree
 check_address_or_pointer_of_packed_member (tree type, tree rhs)
 {
   bool rvalue = true;
+  bool indirect = false;
 
   if (INDIRECT_REF_P (rhs))
-    rhs = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0);
+    {
+      rhs = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0);
+      indirect = true;
+    }
 
   if (TREE_CODE (rhs) == ADDR_EXPR)
     {
       rhs = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0);
-      rvalue = false;
+      rvalue = indirect;
     }
 
   if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
@@ -2796,6 +2800,10 @@ check_address_or_pointer_of_packed_member (tree ty
 	  if (context)
 	    break;
 	}
+      if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (rhs)) == ARRAY_TYPE)
+	rvalue = false;
+      if (rvalue)
+	return NULL_TREE;
       rhs = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0);
     }
 
@@ -2811,15 +2819,19 @@ check_address_or_pointer_of_packed_member (tree ty
 static void
 check_and_warn_address_or_pointer_of_packed_member (tree type, tree rhs)
 {
-  bool nop_p;
+  bool nop_p = false;
+  tree orig_rhs;
 
-  while (TREE_CODE (rhs) == COMPOUND_EXPR)
-    rhs = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 1);
+  do
+    {
+      while (TREE_CODE (rhs) == COMPOUND_EXPR)
+	rhs = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 1);
+      orig_rhs = rhs;
+      STRIP_NOPS (rhs);
+      nop_p |= orig_rhs != rhs;
+    }
+  while (orig_rhs != rhs);
 
-  tree orig_rhs = rhs;
-  STRIP_NOPS (rhs);
-  nop_p = orig_rhs != rhs;
-
   if (TREE_CODE (rhs) == COND_EXPR)
     {
       /* Check the THEN path.  */
Index: gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Waddress-of-packed-member-1.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Waddress-of-packed-member-1.c	(revision 268195)
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Waddress-of-packed-member-1.c	(working copy)
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ struct t {
   int b;
   int *c;
   int d[10];
+  int *e[1];
+  _Complex float f;
 } __attribute__((packed));
 
 struct t t0;
@@ -17,6 +19,8 @@ struct t *bar();
 struct t (*baz())[10];
 struct t (*bazz())[10][10];
 int *i1;
+int **i2;
+float f0, *f1;
 __UINTPTR_TYPE__ u1;
 __UINTPTR_TYPE__ baa();
 
@@ -40,6 +44,13 @@ void foo (void)
   i1 = t10[0].c;               /* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
   u1 = (__UINTPTR_TYPE__) &t0; /* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
   u1 = (__UINTPTR_TYPE__) t1;  /* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i1 = t10[0].e[0];            /* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i1 = *&t0.c;                 /* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  f0 = __real__ t0.f;          /* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  f0 = __imag__ t0.f;          /* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  f0 = *&__real__ t0.f;        /* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  f0 = *&__imag__ t0.f;        /* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i1 = (&t0.c, (int*) 0);      /* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
   t2 = (struct t**) t10;     /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
   t2 = (struct t**) t100;    /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
   t2 = (struct t**) t1;      /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
@@ -52,4 +63,14 @@ void foo (void)
   i1 = t0.d;                 /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
   i1 = t1->d;                /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
   i1 = t10[0].d;             /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i1 = (int*) &t10[0].e[0];  /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i1 = (int*) t10[0].e;      /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i2 = &t10[0].e[0];         /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i2 = t10[0].e;             /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i2 = &*&t0.c;              /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  f1 = &__real__ t0.f;       /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  f1 = &__imag__ t0.f;       /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i1 = (0, (int*) &t0.c);    /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i1 = (int*) (0, &t0.c);    /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i1 = (0, (int*)(0, &t0.c));/* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
 }
Index: gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Waddress-of-packed-member-2.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Waddress-of-packed-member-2.c	(revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Waddress-of-packed-member-2.c	(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Waddress-of-packed-member" } */
+
+struct r {
+  int a[10];
+  int b[10][10];
+};
+
+struct s {
+  char c;
+  struct r p;
+} __attribute__((packed));
+
+struct t {
+  char c;
+  struct r p __attribute__((packed));
+  struct r u;
+};
+
+struct s s0;
+struct t t0;
+int *i0;
+
+void foo (void)
+{
+  i0 = s0.p.a;               /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i0 = t0.p.a;               /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i0 = s0.p.b[0];            /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i0 = t0.p.b[0];            /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i0 = &s0.p.a[0];           /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i0 = &t0.p.a[0];           /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i0 = &s0.p.b[0][0];        /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i0 = &t0.p.b[0][0];        /* { dg-warning "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i0 = t0.u.a;                 /* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i0 = t0.u.b[0];              /* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i0 = &t0.u.a[0];             /* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+  i0 = &t0.u.b[0][0];          /* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" } */
+}

Reply via email to