Hi, I'd like to propose the following hunk mentioning -Wabsolute-value in changes.html of the upcoming gcc 9. Is it OK?
Thanks, Martin Index: htdocs/gcc-9/changes.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-9/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.36 diff -u -r1.36 changes.html --- htdocs/gcc-9/changes.html 18 Jan 2019 11:52:13 -0000 1.36 +++ htdocs/gcc-9/changes.html 26 Jan 2019 21:57:17 -0000 @@ -89,6 +89,18 @@ </ul></li> </ul> +<h3 id="c">C</h3> +<ul> + <li>New warnings: + <ul> + <li><code>-Wabsolute-value</code> warns when a wrong absolute value + function seems to be used or when it does not have any effect because + its argument is an unsigned type. The <code>-Wabsolute-value</code> + option is included in <code>-Wextra</code>. + </li> + </ul></li> +</ul> + <h3 id="cxx">C++</h3> <ul> <li>New warnings:
