On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 1:43 PM Tom de Vries <tdevr...@suse.de> wrote: > > What is an acceptable way to proceed here? I could add a > libbacktrace_nodwarf.la, and have the test-case add a -DFOR_TESTING or > some such when compiling dwarf.c, and add the necessary handling in > dwarf.c conditional on FOR_TESTING. WDYT?
I guess we could try it. I'm very seriously concerned with the additional complexity being added to this package. It has to live in a very constrained space and it's already complex. Sacrificing maintainability for testing is a bad tradeoff in the long run. But we can try it. Ian
