> Yeah, something like that. It will need some serious testing, to make > sure we don't regress (including not regressing what that patch that took > them away was meant to do). I can arrange some testing, will you do the > patch though?
I can do the patch and also (correctness) testing for 32-bit Linux. Another issue is the extent of the patch: practically speaking, putting back the '*' modifier before all the 'd' constraints would be sufficient, but the current setting is a bit inconsistent|*] so this could also be adjusted. [*] For example, in the *movdi_internal32 pattern, 2 'wi' constraints have it but not the other 2. Likewise for "wv'. -- Eric Botcazou
