On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 01:58:27PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:03:29PM +0100, Thomas König wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > > > >> I think this was introduced quite some time ago, not sure if it > > >> was ever documented anywhere. I guess we should do so. > > >> > > > Probably want to document this in the testcase. > > > > I just checked and found 77 occurences in the test suite (most of > > them mine, to be sure). So, maybe an entry in the wiki would be > > more appropriate. > > > > I am just trying to think of who introduced this (or if this > > is even gfortran specific), but coming up blank. Does anybody > > remember? > > > > It looks like a fortuitous accident. > > % svn annotate gcc/testsuite/lib/gfortran-dg.exp > 84792 tobi # look if this is dg-do-run test, in which case > 84792 tobi # we cycle through the option list, otherwise we don't > 84792 tobi if [expr [search_for $test "dg-do run"]] { > 135381 janis set option_list $torture_with_loops > 84792 tobi } else { > 84792 tobi set option_list [list { -O } ] > 84792 tobi } > > The string "dg-do run" does not match, so the torture loops are run. >
Whoop. s/are run/are not run/ IIRC, r84792 is the earliest svn revision for gfortran. Need to go back to the old cvs repository to find out more. -- Steve 20170425 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWUpyCsUKR4 20161221 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbCHE-hONow