Hi!

The last testcase in the patch diagnoses invalid constexpr in the
ptr case, but doesn't for arr.
The array is constexpr, so we do:
      value = fold_non_dependent_expr (value);
      if (DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P (decl)
          || (DECL_IN_AGGR_P (decl)
              && DECL_INITIALIZED_IN_CLASS_P (decl)))
        {
          /* Diagnose a non-constant initializer for constexpr variable or
             non-inline in-class-initialized static data member.  */
          if (!require_constant_expression (value))
            value = error_mark_node;
          else if (processing_template_decl)
            /* In a template we might not have done the necessary
               transformations to make value actually constant,
               e.g. extend_ref_init_temps.  */
            value = maybe_constant_init (value, decl, true);
          else
            value = cxx_constant_init (value, decl);
        }
but require_constant_expression returned true even when there are
REINTERPRET_CAST_Ps in the CONSTRUCTOR, and then cxx_constant_init
doesn't reject it, because:
    case CONSTRUCTOR:
      if (TREE_CONSTANT (t) && reduced_constant_expression_p (t))
        {
          /* Don't re-process a constant CONSTRUCTOR, but do fold it to
             VECTOR_CST if applicable.  */
          verify_constructor_flags (t);
          if (TREE_CONSTANT (t))
            return fold (t);
        }
      r = cxx_eval_bare_aggregate (ctx, t, lval,
                                   non_constant_p, overflow_p);
      break;
and reduced_constant_expression_p is true on it, so we never try to evaluate
it.

The following patch changes potential_constant_expression_1 to reject the
REINTERPRET_CAST_P, not really sure if that is the best way though.

In any case, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.

2019-03-07  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR c++/89599
        * constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_1): Reject
        REINTERPRET_CAST_P NOP_EXPRs.

        * g++.dg/ubsan/vptr-4.C: Adjust expected diagnostics.
        * g++.dg/parse/array-size2.C: Likewise.
        * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-89599.C: New test.

--- gcc/cp/constexpr.c.jj       2019-03-07 14:03:00.040329107 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/constexpr.c  2019-03-07 15:36:30.831721422 +0100
@@ -5997,6 +5997,13 @@ potential_constant_expression_1 (tree t,
       return true;
 
     case NOP_EXPR:
+      if (REINTERPRET_CAST_P (t))
+       {
+         if (flags & tf_error)
+           error_at (loc, "a reinterpret_cast is not a constant expression");
+         return false;
+       }
+      /* FALLTHRU */
     case CONVERT_EXPR:
     case VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR:
       /* -- a reinterpret_cast.  FIXME not implemented, and this rule
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/vptr-4.C.jj      2019-02-21 22:20:24.886099340 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/vptr-4.C 2019-03-07 15:59:34.853143085 +0100
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ struct T : S {
 };
 
 constexpr T t;
-constexpr const T *p = t.foo ();       // { dg-message "expansion of" }
+constexpr const T *p = t.foo ();       // { dg-error "called in a constant 
expression" }
 
 template <typename U>
 struct V {
@@ -39,17 +39,16 @@ struct W : V<U> {
 };
 
 constexpr W<int> w;
-constexpr const W<int> *s = w.foo ();  // { dg-error "is not a constant 
expression" }
-// { dg-message "expansion of" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+constexpr const W<int> *s = w.foo ();  // { dg-error "called in a constant 
expression" }
 
 template <typename U>
 int foo (void)
 {
   static constexpr T t;
-  static constexpr const T *p = t.foo ();      // { dg-message "expansion of" }
+  static constexpr const T *p = t.foo ();      // { dg-error "called in a 
constant expression" }
   static constexpr W<U> w;
-  static constexpr const W<U> *s = w.foo ();   // { dg-error "is not a 
constant expression" }
-  return t.b + w.b;                            // { dg-message "expansion of" 
"" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+  static constexpr const W<U> *s = w.foo ();   // { dg-error "called in a 
constant expression" }
+  return t.b + w.b;
 }
 
 int x = foo <char> ();
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/array-size2.C.jj 2018-11-29 23:11:40.225616846 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/array-size2.C    2019-03-07 15:51:12.998330254 
+0100
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ void
 foo (void)
 {
   char g[(char *) &((struct S *) 0)->b - (char *) 0]; // { dg-error "40:size 
of array .g. is not an integral constant-expression" }
+                                                     // { dg-error "narrowing 
conversion" "" { target c++11 } .-1 }
+                                                     // { dg-message 
"expression has a constant value but is not a C.. constant-expression" "" { 
target c++11 } .-2 }
   char h[(__SIZE_TYPE__) &((struct S *) 8)->b];              // { dg-error 
"10:size of array .h. is not an integral constant-expression" }
   bar (g, h);
 }
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-89599.C.jj     2019-03-07 
16:04:43.526107447 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-89599.C        2019-03-07 
16:04:14.519580648 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// PR c++/89599
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+void foo (int x) {}
+constexpr void *arr[2] = { (void*) &foo, (void *) foo };// { dg-error "a 
reinterpret_cast is not a constant expression" }
+constexpr void *ptr = (void *) &foo;                   // { dg-error "a 
reinterpret_cast is not a constant expression" }

        Jakub

Reply via email to