On 11/03/19 08:58 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:36:08PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Ok for trunk if normal bootstrap/regtest succeeds (i.e. including the default 
flags
testing)?

Normal bootstrap/regtest on x86_64-linux and i686-linux succeeded too.

2019-03-10  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR libstdc++/89641
        * include/std/atomic (atomic<T>::store, atomic<T>::load,
        atomic<T>::exchange, atomic<T>::compare_exchange_weak,
        atomic<T>::compare_exchange_strong): Cast __m or __s and __f to int.
        * include/bits/atomic_base.h (__atomic_base<T>::operator++,
        __atomic_base<T>::operator--, __atomic_base<T>::operator+=,
        __atomic_base<T>::operator-=, __atomic_base<T>::operator&=,
        __atomic_base<T>::operator|=, __atomic_base<T>::operator^=,
        __atomic_base<T*>::operator++, __atomic_base<T*>::operator--,
        __atomic_base<T*>::operator+=, __atomic_base<T*>::operator-=): Cast
        memory_order_seq_cst to int.

OK for trunk, thanks.

I'll make sure we have a test that runs routinely with -std=gnu++2a.

Reply via email to