Hi!

The following patch (the second hunk in particular) should fix following
testcase.  c_build_qualified_type used to be called unconditionally at that
spot, it was just the changes to use quals_used instead of type_quals there
that made it conditional, but it needs to be done even if quals_used is 0,
when TYPE_QUALS is non-zero and we need to remove quals.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2019-03-18  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR c/89734
        * c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): Call c_build_qualified_type on function
        return type even if quals_used is 0.  Formatting fixes.

        * gcc.dg/pr89734.c: New test.

--- gcc/c/c-decl.c.jj   2019-03-11 22:56:44.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/c/c-decl.c      2019-03-18 13:55:17.679750733 +0100
@@ -6611,10 +6611,12 @@ grokdeclarator (const struct c_declarato
                  quals_used &= TYPE_QUAL_ATOMIC;
                if (quals_used && VOID_TYPE_P (type) && really_funcdef)
                  pedwarn (specs_loc, 0,
-                          "function definition has qualified void return 
type");
+                          "function definition has qualified void "
+                          "return type");
                else
                  warning_at (specs_loc, OPT_Wignored_qualifiers,
-                          "type qualifiers ignored on function return type");
+                             "type qualifiers ignored on function "
+                             "return type");
 
                /* Ensure an error for restrict on invalid types; the
                   DR#423 resolution is not entirely clear about
@@ -6624,8 +6626,7 @@ grokdeclarator (const struct c_declarato
                    && (!POINTER_TYPE_P (type)
                        || !C_TYPE_OBJECT_OR_INCOMPLETE_P (TREE_TYPE (type))))
                  error_at (loc, "invalid use of %<restrict%>");
-               if (quals_used)
-                 type = c_build_qualified_type (type, quals_used);
+               type = c_build_qualified_type (type, quals_used);
              }
            type_quals = TYPE_UNQUALIFIED;
 
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr89734.c.jj   2019-03-18 13:59:14.916942573 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr89734.c      2019-03-18 14:02:28.801814072 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* PR c/89734 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "" } */
+
+typedef const int CI;
+typedef _Atomic int AI;
+
+CI foo (void);
+const int foo (void);
+
+AI baz (void);
+_Atomic int baz (void);

        Jakub

Reply via email to