On 4/5/19 7:11 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
this error-recovery regressions is mostly another case - similar to
c++/89488 - where we want to check that maybe_instantiate_noexcept
actually succeeds before calling a function that asserts
!DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P, nothrow_spec_p this time. I think we want to
do that consistently in both the semantics.c places. Beyond that, there
is a secondary issue with -std=c++98, because, in that case,
synthesized_method_walk, called by implicitly_declare_fn, sets raises to
error_mark_node and we can't pass it to build_exception_variant (we
explicitly avoid that elsewhere too). Tested x86_64-linux.
OK.
Jason
