On 13 November 2011 04:28, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > @@ -1269,7 +1269,7 @@ > to display how ad hoc this is: On Solaris, both -pthreads and > -threads (with subtly different meanings) are honored. On OSF, > -pthread and -threads (with subtly different meanings) are > - honored. On Linux/i386, -pthread is honored. On FreeBSD, > + honored. On GNU/Linux i386, -pthread is honored. On FreeBSD,
Would that be improved by replacing i386 with x86? libstdc++ omits several features when built for 80386 due to the lack of certain atomic operations, so I think it might be useful if the manual used x86 to refer to the generic architecture, as opposed to i386 which makes me think of -march=i386.
