On 11/14/2011 01:18 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/14/2011 08:08 AM, David Gilbert wrote:
Andrew, what's the state of discussion on the atomics library? While I
understand that vendors want to be able to replace that library, and thus we
want to settle on a standard ABI, I think *not* providing at least a reference
copy with GCC is almost certainly a mistake.
There should be one sometime in the next few weeks... I have no
intention of providing a compiler without SOMETHING that people can
acquire and build. It just may not be part of the compiler, but will be
easily available.
Andrew
