On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 05:36:47PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > So we're well into stage4 which means technically it's too late for > > something like this. However, given it's limited scope I won't object > > if the ARM port maintainers want to go forward. Otherwise I'll queue it > > for gcc-10. > > > > jeff > > > > I was about to approve this (modulo removing the now obsolete > FPU_DEFAULT macro), until I noticed that it also modifies the generic > NetBSD code as well. I'm certainly not willing to approve that myself > at this late stage, but if one of the NetBSD OS maintainers wants to > step up and do so, I'll happily take the Arm back-end code as that's not > a primary or secondary target. > > R.
Congrats on a new release :-) ping