On 5/6/19 4:00 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> I'm sending following backport that I've just tested.
> 
> Martin
> 

Hi.

There are 2 more patches that I've tested.

Martin
>From af452cc71498c097d09bc8ecd848d28555a00bb2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin <marxin@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 07:04:58 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Backport r271116

gcc/ChangeLog:

2019-05-13  Martin Liska  <mli...@suse.cz>

	PR gcov-profile/90380
	* gcov.c (enum loop_type): Remove the enum and
	the operator.
	(handle_cycle): Assert that we should not reach
	a negative count.
	(circuit): Use loop_found instead of a tri-state loop_type.
	(get_cycles_count): Do not handle NEGATIVE_LOOP as it can't
	happen.
---
 gcc/gcov.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/gcov.c b/gcc/gcov.c
index c7c52ce3629..47c784a9388 100644
--- a/gcc/gcov.c
+++ b/gcc/gcov.c
@@ -604,27 +604,11 @@ bool function_info::group_line_p (unsigned n, unsigned src_idx)
 typedef vector<arc_info *> arc_vector_t;
 typedef vector<const block_info *> block_vector_t;
 
-/* Enum with types of loop in CFG.  */
-
-enum loop_type
-{
-  NO_LOOP = 0,
-  LOOP = 1,
-  NEGATIVE_LOOP = 3
-};
-
-/* Loop_type operator that merges two values: A and B.  */
-
-inline loop_type& operator |= (loop_type& a, loop_type b)
-{
-    return a = static_cast<loop_type> (a | b);
-}
-
 /* Handle cycle identified by EDGES, where the function finds minimum cs_count
    and subtract the value from all counts.  The subtracted value is added
    to COUNT.  Returns type of loop.  */
 
-static loop_type
+static void
 handle_cycle (const arc_vector_t &edges, int64_t &count)
 {
   /* Find the minimum edge of the cycle, and reduce all nodes in the cycle by
@@ -640,7 +624,7 @@ handle_cycle (const arc_vector_t &edges, int64_t &count)
   for (unsigned i = 0; i < edges.size (); i++)
     edges[i]->cs_count -= cycle_count;
 
-  return cycle_count < 0 ? NEGATIVE_LOOP : LOOP;
+  gcc_assert (cycle_count >= 0);
 }
 
 /* Unblock a block U from BLOCKED.  Apart from that, iterate all blocks
@@ -671,12 +655,12 @@ unblock (const block_info *u, block_vector_t &blocked,
    blocked by a block.  COUNT is accumulated count of the current LINE.
    Returns what type of loop it contains.  */
 
-static loop_type
+static bool
 circuit (block_info *v, arc_vector_t &path, block_info *start,
 	 block_vector_t &blocked, vector<block_vector_t> &block_lists,
 	 line_info &linfo, int64_t &count)
 {
-  loop_type result = NO_LOOP;
+  bool loop_found = false;
 
   /* Add v to the block list.  */
   gcc_assert (find (blocked.begin (), blocked.end (), v) == blocked.end ());
@@ -691,15 +675,19 @@ circuit (block_info *v, arc_vector_t &path, block_info *start,
 
       path.push_back (arc);
       if (w == start)
-	/* Cycle has been found.  */
-	result |= handle_cycle (path, count);
+	{
+	  /* Cycle has been found.  */
+	  handle_cycle (path, count);
+	  loop_found = true;
+	}
       else if (find (blocked.begin (), blocked.end (), w) == blocked.end ())
-	result |= circuit (w, path, start, blocked, block_lists, linfo, count);
+	loop_found |= circuit (w, path, start, blocked, block_lists, linfo,
+			       count);
 
       path.pop_back ();
     }
 
-  if (result != NO_LOOP)
+  if (loop_found)
     unblock (v, blocked, block_lists);
   else
     for (arc_info *arc = v->succ; arc; arc = arc->succ_next)
@@ -716,14 +704,13 @@ circuit (block_info *v, arc_vector_t &path, block_info *start,
 	  list.push_back (v);
       }
 
-  return result;
+  return loop_found;
 }
 
-/* Find cycles for a LINFO.  If HANDLE_NEGATIVE_CYCLES is set and the line
-   contains a negative loop, then perform the same function once again.  */
+/* Find cycles for a LINFO.  */
 
 static gcov_type
-get_cycles_count (line_info &linfo, bool handle_negative_cycles = true)
+get_cycles_count (line_info &linfo)
 {
   /* Note that this algorithm works even if blocks aren't in sorted order.
      Each iteration of the circuit detection is completely independent
@@ -731,7 +718,7 @@ get_cycles_count (line_info &linfo, bool handle_negative_cycles = true)
      Therefore, operating on a permuted order (i.e., non-sorted) only
      has the effect of permuting the output cycles.  */
 
-  loop_type result = NO_LOOP;
+  bool loop_found = false;
   gcov_type count = 0;
   for (vector<block_info *>::iterator it = linfo.blocks.begin ();
        it != linfo.blocks.end (); it++)
@@ -739,14 +726,10 @@ get_cycles_count (line_info &linfo, bool handle_negative_cycles = true)
       arc_vector_t path;
       block_vector_t blocked;
       vector<block_vector_t > block_lists;
-      result |= circuit (*it, path, *it, blocked, block_lists, linfo,
-			 count);
+      loop_found |= circuit (*it, path, *it, blocked, block_lists, linfo,
+			     count);
     }
 
-  /* If we have a negative cycle, repeat the find_cycles routine.  */
-  if (result == NEGATIVE_LOOP && handle_negative_cycles)
-    count += get_cycles_count (linfo, false);
-
   return count;
 }
 
-- 
2.21.0

>From 33a14c2ebe20dc58e986503fb00814e10dec9b1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin <marxin@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 07:05:23 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Backport r271117

gcc/ChangeLog:

2019-05-13  Martin Liska  <mli...@suse.cz>

	PR gcov-profile/90380
	* gcov.c (handle_cycle): Do not support zero cycle count,
	it should not be possible.
	(path_contains_zero_cycle_arc): New function.
	(circuit): Ignore zero cycle arc counts.
---
 gcc/gcov.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/gcov.c b/gcc/gcov.c
index 47c784a9388..a99802079dc 100644
--- a/gcc/gcov.c
+++ b/gcc/gcov.c
@@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ handle_cycle (const arc_vector_t &edges, int64_t &count)
   for (unsigned i = 0; i < edges.size (); i++)
     edges[i]->cs_count -= cycle_count;
 
-  gcc_assert (cycle_count >= 0);
+  gcc_assert (cycle_count > 0);
 }
 
 /* Unblock a block U from BLOCKED.  Apart from that, iterate all blocks
@@ -650,6 +650,17 @@ unblock (const block_info *u, block_vector_t &blocked,
     unblock (*it, blocked, block_lists);
 }
 
+/* Return true when PATH contains a zero cycle arc count.  */
+
+static bool
+path_contains_zero_cycle_arc (arc_vector_t &path)
+{
+  for (unsigned i = 0; i < path.size (); i++)
+    if (path[i]->cs_count == 0)
+      return true;
+  return false;
+}
+
 /* Find circuit going to block V, PATH is provisional seen cycle.
    BLOCKED is vector of blocked vertices, BLOCK_LISTS contains vertices
    blocked by a block.  COUNT is accumulated count of the current LINE.
@@ -670,7 +681,9 @@ circuit (block_info *v, arc_vector_t &path, block_info *start,
   for (arc_info *arc = v->succ; arc; arc = arc->succ_next)
     {
       block_info *w = arc->dst;
-      if (w < start || !linfo.has_block (w))
+      if (w < start
+	  || arc->cs_count == 0
+	  || !linfo.has_block (w))
 	continue;
 
       path.push_back (arc);
@@ -680,7 +693,8 @@ circuit (block_info *v, arc_vector_t &path, block_info *start,
 	  handle_cycle (path, count);
 	  loop_found = true;
 	}
-      else if (find (blocked.begin (), blocked.end (), w) == blocked.end ())
+      else if (!path_contains_zero_cycle_arc (path)
+	       &&  find (blocked.begin (), blocked.end (), w) == blocked.end ())
 	loop_found |= circuit (w, path, start, blocked, block_lists, linfo,
 			       count);
 
@@ -693,7 +707,9 @@ circuit (block_info *v, arc_vector_t &path, block_info *start,
     for (arc_info *arc = v->succ; arc; arc = arc->succ_next)
       {
 	block_info *w = arc->dst;
-	if (w < start || !linfo.has_block (w))
+	if (w < start
+	    || arc->cs_count == 0
+	    || !linfo.has_block (w))
 	  continue;
 
 	size_t index
-- 
2.21.0

Reply via email to