Hi Richard, On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 23:24, Richard Earnshaw (lists) <richard.earns...@arm.com> wrote: > > On 15/05/2019 13:48, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > On 15/05/2019 03:39, kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org wrote: > >> From: Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> > >> > > > > The subject line to this email is not helpful. Why should I be > > interested in reviewing this patch? Also, why does it claim to be 2/2 > > when there's no 1/2 to go with it? > > Ah, just noticed that there is a part 1/2 (and a part 0/2) but they hit > a different filter in my mailer so ended up in a different folder. That > doesn't affect the other comments, though: each patch should be > self-contained, even if there's an overall covering letter.
My bad. I will do as you suggested from now on. Thanks, Kugan > > R. > > > > > Please include with all patches a justification giving background to why > > you believe the patch is correct. All patches need this sort of > > description - don't assume that the reviewer is familiar with the code > > or will just accept your word for it. > > > > R. > >
