On 16/05/19 13:07 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 5/16/19 12:36 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 5:41 PM Maxim Kuvyrkov
<maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org> wrote:
On May 16, 2019, at 7:22 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/15/19 5:19 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
For the official converted repo do we really want all (old)
development branches to be in the
main git repo? I suppose we could create a readonly git from the
state of the whole repository
at the point of conversion (and also keep the SVN in readonly mode),
just to make migration
of content we want easy in the future?
I've always assumed we'd keep the old SVN tree read-only for historical
purposes. I strongly suspect that, ignoring release branches, that
non-active branches just aren't terribly interesting.
Let's avoid mixing the two discussions: (1) converting svn repo to git (and
getting community consensus to switch to git) and (2) deciding on which
branches to keep in the new repo.
I'm hoping that there is still community consensus to switch to git.
Personally speaking, a +1 to switch to git.
Absolutely +1 for converting as well.
Yes please!
Thanks for working on this, Maxim.
