On May 30, 2019, at 10:55 AM, James Youngman <j...@gnu.org> wrote:
> I'm looking into creating a C++ coding standard for GNU programs.

So, parts of how we do C++ isn't really relevant to a larger community.  We at 
times cater to a C legacy and in a pure C++ project, there may be no need to do 
this.

ChangeLogs are debatable, and a project might want to option out of them.  
We've talk about this from time to time, but haven't decided to do that.

We sometimes talk about significantly older language standards.  I'd like to 
think most project would update which language standard they use just a wee bit 
faster than we do.

But, all in all, sounds like a reasonable thing to do.  One skilled it the art 
of C++ and coding standards should be able to tease out the things that makes 
less sense I'd like to think.

Reply via email to