On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 03:58:07PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> Commit r271869 broke visibility declarations in asm for extern symbols, 
> because
> the new ASM_OUTPUT_EXTERNAL hook failed to call the default hook for elf.

OK.

In future, you can consider a patch like this to fall under the "obvious"
rule and commit it without review.

Thanks,
James

> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2019-06-04  Szabolcs Nagy  <szabolcs.n...@arm.com>
> 
>       * config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (aarch64_asm_output_external): Remove
>       const.
>       * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_asm_output_external): Call
>       default_elf_asm_output_external.

> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h 
> b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h
> index 6dccabc8cf7..1e3b1c91db1 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h
> @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ bool aarch64_is_noplt_call_p (rtx);
>  bool aarch64_label_mentioned_p (rtx);
>  void aarch64_declare_function_name (FILE *, const char*, tree);
>  void aarch64_asm_output_alias (FILE *, const tree, const tree);
> -void aarch64_asm_output_external (FILE *, const tree, const char*);
> +void aarch64_asm_output_external (FILE *, tree, const char*);
>  bool aarch64_legitimate_pic_operand_p (rtx);
>  bool aarch64_mask_and_shift_for_ubfiz_p (scalar_int_mode, rtx, rtx);
>  bool aarch64_masks_and_shift_for_bfi_p (scalar_int_mode, unsigned 
> HOST_WIDE_INT,
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> index 263ed21442c..7acc3227a78 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> @@ -15650,8 +15650,9 @@ aarch64_asm_output_alias (FILE *stream, const tree 
> decl, const tree target)
>     function symbol references.  */
>  
>  void
> -aarch64_asm_output_external (FILE *stream, const tree decl, const char* name)
> +aarch64_asm_output_external (FILE *stream, tree decl, const char* name)
>  {
> +  default_elf_asm_output_external (stream, decl, name);
>    aarch64_asm_output_variant_pcs (stream, decl, name);
>  }
>  

Reply via email to